Radaris Loses Domains in New Jersey Privacy Lawsuit
Court orders transfer of radaris.com and related domains to plaintiffs after alleged violations of state law enforcement privacy protections
Key Takeaways
- New Jersey court ordered transfer of radaris.com and over a dozen related domains to plaintiffs
- Lawsuit alleges Radaris violated state privacy law by publishing personal information of law enforcement officials
- Judge cited Radaris's non-compliance with removal requests and alleged stonewalling by attorneys
- Ruling may set precedent for enforcement of privacy laws against data brokers
- No technical exploitation; action is a civil legal proceeding
Quick answers
- What happened?
- A New Jersey court has ordered the transfer of radaris.com and more than a dozen related domains to plaintiffs, citing the consumer data broker's alleged violation of state privacy law by publishing personal information of state law enforcement officials. The ruling follows repeated non-compliance with removal requests and represents a significant enforcement action against a major data broker.
- What should defenders do?
- Radaris and other data brokers should ensure compliance with applicable privacy laws and court removal requests. Organizations involving state law enforcement officials should monitor for unauthorized publication of personal information and pursue legal remedies where applicable. Compliance with privacy regulations and prompt response to removal requests can help avoid similar legal actions.
A New Jersey court has ordered the transfer of radaris.com and more than a dozen related domains to plaintiffs in a case alleging the consumer data broker violated state privacy law. The lawsuit alleged that Radaris published personal information of state law enforcement officials despite repeated requests for removal. In the face of what the court described as repeated stonewalling and prevarication by Radaris's attorneys, the judge ruled that the domains be transferred to the plaintiffs. The ruling marks a significant enforcement action against a data broker known for its people-search services and may set a precedent for how privacy laws are applied to the data broker industry. The case highlights growing legal scrutiny of data brokers' handling of sensitive personal information, particularly when it involves state officials. While the court order addresses domain ownership, the broader implications for privacy protections and data broker compliance remain under observation. No technical exploitation was involved; the action stems from a civil legal proceeding alleging violations of New Jersey privacy statutes.
Security Details
The incident involves a court-ordered domain transfer resulting from alleged violations of New Jersey privacy law. The case stems from civil legal proceedings, not technical exploitation or malware. Radaris is alleged to have published personal information of state law enforcement officials despite removal requests.
Mitigation
Radaris and other data brokers should ensure compliance with applicable privacy laws and court removal requests. Organizations involving state law enforcement officials should monitor for unauthorized publication of personal information and pursue legal remedies where applicable. Compliance with privacy regulations and prompt response to removal requests can help avoid similar legal actions.
Sources
Krebs on Security
Data Broker Radaris Loses Domains in Privacy Fight
Sep 16, 2026 · 18:14
Original link
Related Security News
Times Car Confirms Data Breach Affecting 6.6 Million User Accounts
Times Car, a Japanese car-sharing service, has confirmed a data breach compromising approximately 6.6 million user accounts. The incident was disclosed late last week, with the exact attack vector and nature of exposed personal information yet to be fully specified. Authorities and the company are reportedly investigating the breach.
OpenAI AI Agents Accidentally Upload User Images to Third-Party Sites
OpenAI has confirmed that its AI agents inadvertently uploaded user-provided images to external image-hosting services while performing research and evaluation tasks. The incident raises privacy concerns for users who provided images to ChatGPT and related AI services during the affected period.
